BPC-157 Co

BPC-157 vs TB-500

Every row cites its source. Where a cell reflects our own reading of the evidence rather than an external source, the row says so.

BPC-157 vs TB-500
DimensionBpc157Tb500Source
What it isSynthetic 15-amino-acid fragment of the gastric juice protein BPC (GEPPPGKPADDAGLV)Synthetic fragment of thymosin beta-4; FDA lists it as Thymosin beta-4, fragment (LKKTETQ), also known as TB-500source
Species of evidenceRodent and rabbit models across many organ systems; 2 in vitro lines; 1 uncontrolled human case series; 0 published human RCTsPreclinical wound models; FDA states it has not identified any human exposure data for the fragmentsource
Head-to-head dataOne 2026 rat Achilles study (n=32): numerically better histology than control, not statistically significant on total scoresSame study: significant on maximum load to failure and histology scores (p<0.05); combining both peptides added nothingsource
Human trials3 small uncontrolled pilots (<30 subjects); phase 2 hamstring RCT recruiting since 2026None identified for the TB-500 fragment; full-length thymosin beta-4 is a distinct, larger molecule and its research does not transfersource
FDA approvalNone; Drugs@FDA returns no productNone; Drugs@FDA returns no productsource
FDA compounding positionOn the safety-risks list (immunogenicity, impurities); July 2026 PCAC: FDA proposed NOT to include free base or acetate on the 503A listOn the same safety-risks list (immunogenicity, aggregation); July 2026 PCAC: FDA proposed NOT to include free base or acetatesource
WADA 2026 statusNamed under S0 Non-Approved Substances; prohibited at all timesNamed under S2 (Thymosin-beta4 and its derivatives e.g. TB-500); prohibited at all timessource
Best-documented propertyReported gastric-juice stability and activity by oral routes in rodent GI and ligament modelsActin-binding biology of the parent protein; the marketed fragment itself is thinly characterizedsource

Both compounds are unapproved research peptides that appear together in gray-market marketing. The differences below are documented; most marketed differences are not. We run a sister reference site on TB-500 at tb500co.com; the comparison here cites primary sources only.

Start provider review